Darfur Explained

The situation in Darfur explained wth details of the social, political, and environmental history that set the stage for one of the 21st century's most devastating conflicts. The history of Dakar is as intricate and layered as its distinctive urban landscape. Darfur, meaning "home of the Fur," is a massive, semi-arid region roughly the size of France, bordering Libya, Chad, and the Central African Republic. Historically, it was an independent sultanate until incorporated into Anglo-Egyptian Sudan in 1916. The region is characterised by immense ethnic diversity, traditionally divided along lines of livelihood: settled agriculturalists (such as the Fur, Masalit, and Zaghawa), and nomadic or semi-nomadic Arab pastoralists. For generations, these groups maintained complex, often cooperative relationships regarding access to land and scarce water resources, adjudicated by local mechanisms.

However, the late 20th century saw these traditional systems eroded by three critical factors. First, severe desertification and drought in the 1970s and 1980s intensified competition for arable land and grazing routes, forcing Arab nomadic groups further south into areas traditionally held by non-Arab farming communities. Second, the central government in Khartoum, historically dominated by the Nile Valley elite, persistently marginalised Darfur politically and economically, refusing to invest in infrastructure or education. This neglect fueled a sense of grievance among the Darfurian populations who felt they were treated as second-class citizens. Third, and most critically, the government of Omar al-Bashir, which seized power in 1989, began actively cultivating an ideology of Arab dominance, militarising existing ethnic fault lines and exploiting them for political control, particularly after the emergence of oil wealth and subsequent civil wars.

Darfur Explained The breaking point came in 2003. Frustrated by Khartoum’s persistent neglect, two main rebel groups - the Sudan Liberation Movement/Army (SLM/A) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) - launched an insurgency, demanding political inclusion, wealth sharing, and an end to marginalisation. While the rebel groups were relatively small, Khartoum’s response was immediate and utterly devastating. Instead of relying solely on the regular Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the government adopted a strategy of proxy warfare.

Khartoum armed and mobilised pre-existing Arab militias, which came to be known as the Janjaweed (meaning "devils on horseback"). These militias (below), drawn primarily from nomadic Arab communities and fueled by government funding and rhetoric, were unleashed on non-Arab villages, particularly those associated with the Fur, Masalit, and Zaghawa. This was not traditional counterinsurgency; it was a scorched-earth campaign designed to punish the civilian base believed to support the rebels. Tactics involved systematic village destruction, the poisoning of wells, widespread sexual violence used as a weapon of war, and mass killings. Experts and international bodies characterised the violence as ethnic cleansing, culminating in the formal declaration by the United States that genocide was occurring. Between 2003 and 2005, hundreds of thousands were killed, and over two million people were driven from their homes, forced into sprawling, crowded camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs).

Darfur Explained

Volunteer Sudan

Check out all the latest African volunteer work placements and opportunities in Sudan.
More >

History Sudan

A video documentary about the recent history of Sudan from independence to conflict.
More >

Life in Sudan

An article and video documentary about rural daily life in Sudan in pictures and images.
More >

Sudan Profile

Explore all about northern Sudan in pictures, videos and images in our profile pages.
More >

<h3>Situation in Darfur Explained Video"></h3>

The international community's slow and often ineffective response remains a key component of the Darfur tragedy. While the sheer scale of the displacement prompted a massive humanitarian aid effort, meaningful protective intervention was delayed. The African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) lacked the mandate and resources to protect civilians, eventually necessitating the formation of the UN-AU Hybrid Operation in Darfur (UNAMID) in 2007. UNAMID operated under difficult conditions, facing obstruction from the Sudanese government and constant logistical challenges, and was often criticised for its inability to prevent localised attacks.

Crucially, the conflict led to significant legal and political outcomes. In 2009 and 2010, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for President Omar al-Bashir for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity—the first sitting head of state to be indicted by the ICC. While this was a monumental acknowledgement of the atrocities, al-Bashir remained in power for another decade, travelling internationally despite the warrants, highlighting the limits of international law in the face of state sovereignty. Peace efforts, such as the Abuja and Doha processes, yielded very little success, largely because they failed to address the core issues of land ownership, power-sharing, and security sector reform, leading to a fragmented and often renewed cycle of violence.

By the late 2010s, violence had decreased from its peak intensity, but Darfur remained fragile. The overthrow of Omar al-Bashir in 2019 led to cautious optimism for a democratic transition in Sudan. However, this transition was fatally undermined by the deep integration of paramilitary forces—most notably the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which evolved directly from the notorious Janjaweed militias—into the state apparatus.

The current situation is tragically characterised by a catastrophic resurgence of hostilities, directly linked to the national conflict that erupted in April 2023 between the SAF and the RSF. While the fighting began in Khartoum, Darfur quickly became a primary battleground. The RSF and its allied militias, now better armed and organised than ever, seized the opportunity to settle old scores, leading to renewed waves of systematic attacks, especially in West Darfur against the Masalit population. Reports indicate massacres in cities like El Geneina that mirror the brutality of 2003.

This renewed violence has created a humanitarian crisis of terrifying proportions. Nearly 10 million Sudanese have been displaced nationally since 2023, with Darfur accounting for a massive share. The historical persecution, which had been simmering for a decade, has now exploded into open warfare, further regionalising the conflict and threatening the security of neighbouring Chad. The withdrawal of UNAMID in 2020 left a security vacuum that the RSF and aligned militias have exploited mercilessly, effectively rendering Darfur a territory of renewed, widespread ethnic cleansing and war crimes.